I've spent five years in construction safety, implementing and building programs, managing compliance, and trying to make jobsites less dangerous. The traditional playbook (more training, stricter enforcement, better documentation) works up to a point. Then it stops working.
What actually moved the needle was treating field problems like product problems. I started doing user research before I knew what to call it. I built MVPs before I knew that's what they were. The difference between a safety program that sticks and one that doesn't comes down to the same things that make software good: it has to fit how people actually work, not how you wish they worked.
"I'm not leaving construction, I'm trying to make it better from the inside. These tools are what that looks like in practice."
On the side, I take on a small number of projects each year, typically EHS technology evaluations, early-stage construction tech tools, or product consulting where someone needs both domain expertise and product judgment in the same person. If that's relevant to you, let's talk.